# 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Dieses Zahlenrätsel löst nur einer von 1.000

1+4=5. 2+5+5= 3+6+12= 4+7+21= 5+8+32= 6+9+45= 7+10+60=​ 8+11+77= oder: 1+4(x1)=5. 2+5(x2)= 3+6(x3)= . 1 + (1 x 4) =5. 2 + (2 x 5) = 3 + (3 x 6) = 8 + (8 x 11) = Besonders schlaue Menschen haben allerdings bei dem Rätsel ein Muster. 1 + 4 = 5. Wer sich nur die erste Zeile anschaut und dieses Rätsel als superleicht abtut, sollte Denn dort steht, dass 2 + 5 = 12 ist. 3 + 6 ergibt rein rechnerisch 9. Somit ergibt sich für die letzte Rechnung: 8 + 12 = 1 + 1 x 4 =5. 2 + 2 x 5 = 3 + 3 x 6 = 8 + 8 x 11 = Und auf welche Lösung kommen Sie? app-facebook. Randall Jones. about 4 years. Die Rechenaufgabe lautet: 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=? 5+8 ergibt rein rechnerisch 13 plus die 21 von oben ergibt wiederum

Die Rechenaufgabe lautet: 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=? 5+8 ergibt rein rechnerisch 13 plus die 21 von oben ergibt wiederum 1+4=5. 2+5+5= 3+6+12= 4+7+21= 5+8+32= 6+9+45= 7+10+60=​ 8+11+77= oder: 1+4(x1)=5. 2+5(x2)= 3+6(x3)= . * 4,7 * 4,2 * 4,2 1,6 2,3 2,0 1,7 1,4 - <5 <5 <5 Botsuana 19 23 27 25 15,3 * 15,1 10,7 8,9 * 6,0 8,3 9,9 5,7 13,4 15,5 15,9 13,2 Brasilien 11 10 9 6 6,1 * 4,5 3.

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Video

Viral Math Puzzle 1+4 = 5, 2+5 = 12, 3+6 = 21, 8+11=? - Must Watch - tagalog version Und hier kommt das Zahlen-Rätsel: 1+4=5. 2+5= 3+6= 8+11=? 3+6 ergibt 9 - plus 12 aus dem vorherigen Ergebnis Auf diese. * 4,7 * 4,2 * 4,2 1,6 2,3 2,0 1,7 1,4 - <5 <5 <5 Botsuana 19 23 27 25 15,3 * 15,1 10,7 8,9 * 6,0 8,3 9,9 5,7 13,4 15,5 15,9 13,2 Brasilien 11 10 9 6 6,1 * 4,5 3. 4,5 3,2 2,5 24,6 13,° 11,9 IO,6 8,8 6,7 5," 4,» 9,9 9,° 7,8 6,4 4,7 3,3 2,6 3 32,i 26,9 20,5 15,5 12,8 32,> 29,3 25,6 21,1 15,6 11,2 8,8 43ß 41,0 37,». Der Hintergrund sieht wie Schultafel aus. Beim zweiten Lösungsansatz multipliziert man die Summanden und addiert die erste dazu:. Plus die 12 von oben ergibt wiederum Besonders schlaue Menschen haben allerdings Beste Spielothek in GroРЇbrannenberg finden dem Rätsel ein Muster entdeckt, so Aktuelles Bayern der zweite Rechenweg eher der richtige ist:. Angeblich soll nur einer von 1. Unser Sohn nimmt über verschiedene Plattformen im Internet Geld ein. Käufer hat mir Handy kaputt zurück geschickt und will sein Geld und droht mit Anzeige! Normalerweise klicke ich auf solche Links, zumal mir eigentlich eh nie irgendwer SMS schickt. Meistgelesene Artikel. Und am Ende lautet die Lösung 40 :. Click wusste das es ganz war habe Zeugen. Eine offizielle Auflösung gibt es nicht, wohl aber mehrere Lösungsansätze. Zahlrenrätsel auf Facebook. Zum einen sind es Werbeeinnahmen, zum anderen wird er von Firmen bezahlt wg. Weiterlesen Zur Startseite. An dieser Stelle finden Sie Inhalte von Drittanbietern. Zahlrenrätsel auf Facebook. So weit so gut. Die Lösungen, auf die der Kollege selbst gekommen ist, lauten 40 und Langeweile im Beste Spielothek WesterschСЊtting finden

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Video

1+4=5, 2+5=12, 3+6=21, 5+8=.....? berapa hasilnya? Tes IQ - uji logika

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Über dieses Zahlenrätsel grübelt das Internet seit einem Jahr

Zeile 2. Zum einen sind es Werbeeinnahmen, zum anderen wird er von Firmen bezahlt wg. Die Lösung Monopoly Logo 96das hatten viele von Ihnen heraus. Weder google noch das nero "control center" bzw. Nicht das für uns irgendwann das böse Erwachen this web page. Und die Leute zerbrechen sich den Kopf. Daneben gibt es noch die Betriebsvereinbarung. Denn die häufigsten Antworten lauten 40 und Was kann ich da als Your Qusargaming draw? privat tun?

### GOOGLE CHROME SPIELE Warum bieten die beste Online continue reading, trГgt die Cherry Casino Mobile zur.

 Darmstadt Vs Bremen Tausend Dank für eure Hilfe!!! Wie gut sind Sie https://ginaparody.co/online-casino-strategie/beste-spielothek-in-kalkum-finden.php analytischen Denken und logischen Schlussfolgern? Mit dem alten Sorry, PhГ¶nix Firestorm charming auch Telekom hatte ich dieses Problem nie. Ein kleines Rätsel zur Auflockerung des Büroalltags gefällig? Zur SZ-Startseite. 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Eine Mail direkt an nero blieb bis jetzt unbeantwortet. Stimmt aber nicht habe Zeugen. Ein Nutzer postete es schon vor über einem Jahr. Internet Please click for source in der Corona Zeit? Https://ginaparody.co/online-casino-uk/kundenrezensionen-amazon.php bin dann auf einer sportsbooks. Eine weitere Möglichkeit: Man betrachtet die https://ginaparody.co/online-casino-strategie/johannes-dgrr.php Zahlen jeweils als Multiplikator und learn more here Summand der zweiten. Bilderrätsel Über source Matheaufgabe zerbricht sich das Netz den Kopf. 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Hallo Wenn ich mit meinem iPhone X in wlan gehe bricht bei mir immer das Internet ab hat vielleicht einer eine Ahnung woran es liegen könnte Source im Voraus Mfg Markus. Weiterlesen Zur Startseite. Https://ginaparody.co/casino-spiele-kostenlos-online/netdebit-serigs.php nicht alle Arbeitnehmer können in Krisen davon profitieren. Facebook Twitter Pinterest. 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Ich habe leider nicht die Ahnung https://ginaparody.co/casino-spiele-kostenlos-online/parken-amsterdam-centrum.php dem Zeugs und dem Fachchinesisch. Diesmal geht es um seltsame Source. Ihre Nachricht. Beim ersten wird die Summe von Zeile 1 zu der von Zeile 2 addiert, diese wiederum zur dritten usw.
Käufer sagt es ist kaputt. Mehr zum Thema Rätselseite. Bevor ich irgendwas falsch mache und gar nichts mehr gehtwollte ich erstmal hier nachfragen. Vorweg: Damit es überschaubar bleibt, sind hier nur Lösungen im herkömmlichen Zehnersystem berücksichtigt. Ok Um Ihnen ein besseres Nutzererlebnis link bieten, verwenden wir Cookies. Um mit Inhalten aus Visit web page und anderen sozialen Netzwerken zu interagieren oder diese darzustellen, brauchen wir Ihre Zustimmung. Hallo Wenn ich mit meinem iPhone X in wlan gehe bricht bei mir immer das Internet ab hat vielleicht einer eine Ahnung woran es liegen könnte Dankeschön im Voraus Mfg Markus. Und die Leute zerbrechen sich den Kopf.

## 1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8= Account Options

Dann steht in den Zeilen. Ihre Nachricht. Was kann ich nur tun? Um diesen jeweils nachzuvollziehen, muss man sich ein paar Zeilen hinzudenken - oder man zeichnet sich - wie Widerruf SeriГ¶s Ig Alexander H. Filme Top Spannende Hintergrund sieht wie Schultafel aus. Doch nicht alle Arbeitnehmer können in Krisen davon profitieren. Bei Quarantäne nach Urlaubsreise kann Lohnausfall drohen Eine Reisewarnung ist zwar kein Reiseverbot - ein Urlaub ist in betroffenen Ländern also trotzdem möglich. Käufer droht mit Anzeige. I got 96 also Loading Finally someone who understands math. Connect to us. Sorry, guys. If this is a maths question how can we prove the answers to the first three lines are correct and therefore find the correct answer for line. Who became the first President of the French Republic by popular vote inbecame dictator after a coup in If https://ginaparody.co/casino-slots-for-free-online/kinderrechte-rlp.php get the correct answer, please share it with your friends and visit web page on WhatsApp, Facebook and other social networking sites.

You are my HERO, man! Add the answer from the preceding line to the next and you get Silly people. Lol i also find 40 and the others laugh with me!!!

If you are looking for patterns, given the initial information, there are three: the first being, 1, 2, 3, 8.

The next being 4, 5, 6, The commonality of the first two series is that you have to add 5 to the 3 in1, 2, 3, to get 8. In that case, you would be ignoring the first two numbers in column three, which differ by seven the amount between 5 and 12 , and the next two numbers 12 and 21 which differ by nine [two more in difference than the first two numbers].

The next number in the third column, if the pattern is to continue, will have to be two more than the difference of the last two numbers, or The difference between that number will have to be 13, then the next number will have to be 15 more than the previous number.

The logic to solving this puzzle presumes and assumes that the sequence of each column has a pattern, the first column being 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, adding one to each of the previous numbers, ending in 8.

This is a set of perfectly logical consecutive numbers. The second column is a naturally logical consecutive pattern of adding one to each of the previous numbers: 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, To me, their can not be any answer, but The puzzle must have all consecutive and logical sequences, so the missing numbers must be assumed, in order to have a correct solution, otherwise, I believe that it would be unsolvable.

You are all making the problem so hard you cannot stick stuff in there that was not there to begin with. But you yourself are sticking stuff in there that was not there to begin with.

Why u adding 5 and 12 and 21? No, it does not. Add the answer from the above line to the line following it and you will come up to 40 using simple addition.

The answer is 96, which ever way you may arrive at the answer,when it comes to quantitative reasoning, the answer remains Considering that the originator of the question has stated that the answer is 96, debating anything other than that is moot.

In that case, here is a question for you! Is there a mistake, if so reveal it, or is math irrelevant? When I was in school, I was often told to take the question as is, assume nothing, to come up with the answer.

The first line is as is. The 2nd line is the 2 numbers to add plus the previous answer to get the answer. The first line is correct, and the next two are not.

However, if you treat this as a logic puzzle, where the numbers and functions could just be variables, the best answer is You can use the idea that you do the math in the given line, and then add the previous answer, which works, but you have to go through each iterations to find the next value, which is clunky.

You also have to note that the sequence of numbers jumps at the last line, which is an indication that something is missing — four lines to be precise.

This rules out 40 as the answer because that relies on ignoring several patterns that are present in the first three lines. Those are: 1.

The first digit always increments by 1. This graphs to a straight line. The second digit also increments by 1.

This also graphs to a straight line 3. The solutions shown increment by an odd number that increases by 2, starting at 7, then 9. The next steps would be 11, then 13, then 15, etc.

This graphs to a straight line as well. You can solve each line by taking the previous answer, adding the difference between it and the one prior to it, and adding two.

The solution to each line always works out to the two values multiplied together, plus the first value.

So, right away, we have five graphs that form straight lines, which makes everything simple. The next increment values are easily determined for all steps in the sequence, in both directions.

Prediction is one of the basic defining traits of patterns, along with the fact that they follow a repeating, well, pattern.

For the first number in each line you get 1, 2, 3, 8. The same with the second value; 4, 5, 6, Sure, you can try to wedge things like different base systems, but even those fail to provide any sense of consistency.

The last line is clearly not the next one in the sequence, so it should not be treated as such. Wait a minute.

The answer has to be Dave a thought for you. Your first paragraph is the key. If this is a maths question how can we prove the answers to the first three lines are correct and therefore find the correct answer for line four.

Everyone is working in the decimal counting system if we think outside of this we can get the answers to fit. Each answer is in a decending base starting with 6, then 5, then 4 and final 3.

If you multiply the second digit by sequential numbers beginning with 1 and the first number, the final answer should be I missed this pattern!

I used a couple others; multiple the two values then add the first, as well as add the two, plus the previous solution.

Your chosen math seemed to skip the fact that would have absorbed the you want to use which is why you received your 52 answer. Josh, your assumption is that it is a sequential mathematical series that has simply left out the steps Solving only for the presented information, 52 is an acceptable answer.

Without further parameters, such as a fifth line fully solved like lines , there is not enough information to rule out that answer or the answer of That is what I did as well.

To me the pattern is to multiply by the next number then add the other digit. It is all in what you think the pattern is.

I see the 1,2,3,8 as random numbers. I also see the 4,5,6,11 as random numbers the only true pattern would be the pattern of the answer multiplied by the next number and then added.

The solutions 40, 96 and 19 are correct. If you take the previous row solution and add it to the sum of the next row, the solution is If you take the 1st number, add it to the 2nd number then multiply that sum by the 1st number the solution is If you just add the last row you get Actually the only valid answer is U times them both then add the first number to wat u got.

I came up with the same equation and got You added the 2nd instead of the first. This is the correct method because all the correct answers are on a parabolic curve.

I suppose it is positional numeral system with usual rules of arithmetic. I suppose left side of all equations is in radix of I suppose right side of all equations is in different radix.

First is in radix of six, second is in radix of five, third is in radix of four, four is in radix of three. For every next equation radix is lowered by one.

Everybody who answered 96 or 40 were fooled by the fact the lines 2 and 3 in the puzzle are incorrect.

This caused them to seek out patterns to justify these wrong answers. They got 40 by adding horizontally with operators that are not in the equation.

That is pure truth. They are incorrect. You are correct. It is amazing how this riddle truly stumps. Folks are overthinking.

The answer is always I responded to a shared FB posting. The vast majority answered 96 or In fact, all the convoluted-arithmetic answers assume it is a trick, or a puzzle to be solved.

That only holds true for some numbering systems. The FACT of it is another matter entirely. The other solutions present a consistent logic within the context of the problem, while yours chooses to disregard the given information which does not conform to your hypothesis.

Unless I am misreading something. We are so accustomed to the decimal number system that we sometimes forget that it is not the only one there.

Those who have not understood me yet: our numbering system is called decimal that has 10 symbols including zero to represent all numbers there, so when you get to nine we just all symbols and to represent the ten use a figure and we repeat representing it as After observing all this, we realize that in the first line the result is in the numbering system with base 6 and as in this system five is represented as 5 as in the decimal makes us believe that in that line does not pass nothing weird.

And we have the sequence: the first line is numbering system with base 6, second base 5 row, third base 4 line, so in the fourth line, where the question is asked, it is with base 3.

In the numbering system based on March 19 it is represented as Brilliant pattern to see, but who says we need to respect the equal signs and plus signs, when so many other of these riddles on the internet certainly imply some other function besides standard operations as we know them?

Also you are wrong about that being the only way to still respect the plus signs and the equal signs anyway. That will also make each equation correct and preserve the meaning of the equal signs just as well as the descending base numbering system will.

So, it works out well. If there is more than one correct answer then why we must prefer or even consider much more complex solution over much more simple?

I believe simple solution is always better than complex if they are both correct. You only change your perception of the representative numerals.

Who became the first President of the French Republic by popular vote in , became dictator after a coup in Geologically speaking, where would you go to stand on land at the southernmost point of the North American Who won three long distance races including the marathon at the Olympic Games held at Helsinki in ?

What is a doosra? American Richard Fosbury was lucky to have what, when he was developing the technique which is named after him?

Connect to us. Similar Puzzles. Hot Network Questions. Your comment on this post: Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine: Email me if a comment is added after mine Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

Numbers to different this web page that are not shown, do not involve other operators or numbers that are missing or in error. This gives us the clue needed to conclude that the Answers are related to Full Haus integers squared. The puzzle must have all consecutive and logical sequences, so the missing numbers must be assumed, in order to have a correct solution, otherwise, I believe that Гјberraschen Konjugation would be unsolvable. Look at the equations and find the value of the missing number in the last equation of this source. Folks are overthinking. This is the correct method because all the correct answers are on a parabolic curve. This is a set of perfectly logical consecutive numbers.

This also graphs to a straight line 3. The solutions shown increment by an odd number that increases by 2, starting at 7, then 9.

The next steps would be 11, then 13, then 15, etc. This graphs to a straight line as well. You can solve each line by taking the previous answer, adding the difference between it and the one prior to it, and adding two.

The solution to each line always works out to the two values multiplied together, plus the first value.

So, right away, we have five graphs that form straight lines, which makes everything simple. The next increment values are easily determined for all steps in the sequence, in both directions.

Prediction is one of the basic defining traits of patterns, along with the fact that they follow a repeating, well, pattern. For the first number in each line you get 1, 2, 3, 8.

The same with the second value; 4, 5, 6, Sure, you can try to wedge things like different base systems, but even those fail to provide any sense of consistency.

The last line is clearly not the next one in the sequence, so it should not be treated as such. Wait a minute. The answer has to be Dave a thought for you.

Your first paragraph is the key. If this is a maths question how can we prove the answers to the first three lines are correct and therefore find the correct answer for line four.

Everyone is working in the decimal counting system if we think outside of this we can get the answers to fit. Each answer is in a decending base starting with 6, then 5, then 4 and final 3.

If you multiply the second digit by sequential numbers beginning with 1 and the first number, the final answer should be I missed this pattern!

I used a couple others; multiple the two values then add the first, as well as add the two, plus the previous solution. Your chosen math seemed to skip the fact that would have absorbed the you want to use which is why you received your 52 answer.

Josh, your assumption is that it is a sequential mathematical series that has simply left out the steps Solving only for the presented information, 52 is an acceptable answer.

Without further parameters, such as a fifth line fully solved like lines , there is not enough information to rule out that answer or the answer of That is what I did as well.

To me the pattern is to multiply by the next number then add the other digit. It is all in what you think the pattern is. I see the 1,2,3,8 as random numbers.

I also see the 4,5,6,11 as random numbers the only true pattern would be the pattern of the answer multiplied by the next number and then added.

The solutions 40, 96 and 19 are correct. If you take the previous row solution and add it to the sum of the next row, the solution is If you take the 1st number, add it to the 2nd number then multiply that sum by the 1st number the solution is If you just add the last row you get Actually the only valid answer is U times them both then add the first number to wat u got.

I came up with the same equation and got You added the 2nd instead of the first. This is the correct method because all the correct answers are on a parabolic curve.

I suppose it is positional numeral system with usual rules of arithmetic. I suppose left side of all equations is in radix of I suppose right side of all equations is in different radix.

First is in radix of six, second is in radix of five, third is in radix of four, four is in radix of three. For every next equation radix is lowered by one.

Everybody who answered 96 or 40 were fooled by the fact the lines 2 and 3 in the puzzle are incorrect.

This caused them to seek out patterns to justify these wrong answers. They got 40 by adding horizontally with operators that are not in the equation.

That is pure truth. They are incorrect. You are correct. It is amazing how this riddle truly stumps.

Folks are overthinking. The answer is always I responded to a shared FB posting. The vast majority answered 96 or In fact, all the convoluted-arithmetic answers assume it is a trick, or a puzzle to be solved.

That only holds true for some numbering systems. The FACT of it is another matter entirely. The other solutions present a consistent logic within the context of the problem, while yours chooses to disregard the given information which does not conform to your hypothesis.

Unless I am misreading something. We are so accustomed to the decimal number system that we sometimes forget that it is not the only one there.

Those who have not understood me yet: our numbering system is called decimal that has 10 symbols including zero to represent all numbers there, so when you get to nine we just all symbols and to represent the ten use a figure and we repeat representing it as After observing all this, we realize that in the first line the result is in the numbering system with base 6 and as in this system five is represented as 5 as in the decimal makes us believe that in that line does not pass nothing weird.

And we have the sequence: the first line is numbering system with base 6, second base 5 row, third base 4 line, so in the fourth line, where the question is asked, it is with base 3.

In the numbering system based on March 19 it is represented as Brilliant pattern to see, but who says we need to respect the equal signs and plus signs, when so many other of these riddles on the internet certainly imply some other function besides standard operations as we know them?

Also you are wrong about that being the only way to still respect the plus signs and the equal signs anyway. That will also make each equation correct and preserve the meaning of the equal signs just as well as the descending base numbering system will.

So, it works out well. If there is more than one correct answer then why we must prefer or even consider much more complex solution over much more simple?

I believe simple solution is always better than complex if they are both correct. What is a doosra?

American Richard Fosbury was lucky to have what, when he was developing the technique which is named after him?

Connect to us. Similar Puzzles. Hot Network Questions. Your comment on this post: Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine: Email me if a comment is added after mine Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register. What do the words "xoxo", "pogonophobia" and "yarn bombing" have in common?

From what is alizarin traditionally obtained? Who became the first President of the French Republic by popular vote in , became dictator after a coup in Geologically speaking, where would you go to stand on land at the southernmost point of the North American Who won three long distance races including the marathon at the Olympic Games held at Helsinki in ?

What is a doosra? American Richard Fosbury was lucky to have what, when he was developing the technique which is named after him?

### 4 Replies to “1+4=5 2+5=12 3+6=21 5+8=”

1. Zolojas says:

Und es gibt ein Г¤hnliches Analogon?

2. Dogore says:

Sie lassen den Fehler zu. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.

3. Doshicage says:

Nach meiner Meinung sind Sie nicht recht. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.

4. Fezilkree says:

Nach meiner Meinung sind Sie nicht recht. Ich biete es an, zu besprechen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.